28 May, 2025
Indus Water Treaty: India suspended
Thu 24 Apr, 2025
Context
India has suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) following a deadly militant attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which resulted in the death of 26 civilians. This move marks a significant departure from the traditionally upheld water-sharing agreement with Pakistan.
About Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)
Particular | Details |
Signed on | 19th September 1960 |
Signed Between | India and Pakistan |
Brokered By | World Bank (then IBRD) |
Purpose | Water sharing of the Indus River System |
Rivers Included | Indus, Jhelum, Chenab (Western); Ravi, Beas, Sutlej (Eastern) |
Allocation | Pakistan: Western Rivers (80% water); India: Eastern Rivers (20%) |
India’s Rights | Non-consumptive use of western rivers for domestic, agriculture, and hydroelectricity (without storage) |
Dispute Redressal Mechanism | Permanent Indus Commission (PIC), neutral expert, and arbitration |
Commission Function | Annual meetings, technical data exchange, infrastructure project review |
Why is India’s Suspension Significant?
- Diplomatic Tool: Water sharing is a sensitive and strategic tool in bilateral ties. India's decision to suspend cooperation under the IWT indicates hardening stance post cross-border terror incidents.
- International Ramifications: May raise concerns in global water diplomacy; especially since World Bank oversees treaty implementation.
- Strategic Reorientation: India might consider reclaiming full control of its share in western rivers (within treaty limits), including full utilisation through hydroelectric projects like Kishanganga and Ratle.
- Climate Change Link: With rising concerns over Himalayan glacier melt, water security is becoming a national security issue.
Is India’s Move Justified?
- Yes, under Article XII of the treaty, either party can terminate the agreement with a one-year notice, although this has never happened in 63 years.
- Furthermore, India has often accused Pakistan of misusing the dispute resolution mechanism to stall development projects in J&K and of harbouring anti-India terrorism, which compromises the spirit of cooperation.
Implications for India:
- Greater bargaining power in bilateral diplomacy
- Potential domestic political support for stronger response to terrorism
- Risk of international criticism if withdrawal affects humanitarian access
- Impact on downstream water flow to Pakistan, especially during lean months
Indus River System – Geographic Significance:
- Originates from Tibet (China)
- Enters India through Ladakh, flows into Pakistan
- Major rivers: Indus, Jhelum, Chenab (to Pakistan), Ravi, Beas, Sutlej (India uses)
- Crucial for irrigation in both nations
Treaty Name | Country | Subject | Year |
Indus Waters Treaty | Pakistan | Water Sharing (Indus River System) | 1960 |
Tashkent Agreement | Pakistan (with USSR mediation) | Post-1965 War Peace | 1966 |
Shimla Agreement | Pakistan | Bilateral peace post-1971 War | 1972 |
Ganga Water Treaty | Bangladesh | Ganga River water sharing | 1996 |
India-Bhutan Hydropower Agreement | Bhutan | Hydropower cooperation (e.g., Tala, Punatsangchhu) | Ongoing since 2000s |
Mahakali Treaty | Nepal | Water sharing of Mahakali River | 1996 |
Land Boundary Agreement | Bangladesh | Border settlement | 2015 |
India-Sri Lanka Maritime Agreement | Sri Lanka | Maritime boundaries and Katchatheevu Island | 1974 & 1976 |
Conclusion
The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty signifies a growing shift in India’s strategic use of diplomatic tools against Pakistan-backed terrorism. It raises important questions about water security, international cooperation, and sovereign rights, which are key themes for civil service and SSC aspirants alike.
As climate-induced water scarcity rises, treaties like IWT will increasingly become instruments of geopolitical leverage rather than mere cooperation. The coming months will test both countries’ political maturity and the resilience of decades-old agreements.